Conflicted director's failure to disclose was a breach of the duty of care and diligence

The recent case of Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd v McGrath (No 2) concerned Mr McGrath's disclosure obligations as a director. Mr McGrath was the sole director and shareholder of a building company (Denham) and was also a director of the client company (Hakea), which had engaged Denham to construct an aged-care facility. The Federal Court held that Mr McGrath had breached his duty of care and diligence under s 180(1) of the Corporations Act by not disclosing to Hakea that Denham was in severe financial distress and unable to complete the project in a timely fashion. The case is interesting because directors' disclosure obligations in this situation have historically been litigated as breaches of directors' duties to avoid conflicts of interest and/or as breaches of the duty to act in good faith and for a proper purpose, rather than as breaches of the duty of care. For a more detailed discussion of this case and its implications see my note in (2023) 40 Company & Securities Law Journal 1.

Comments

  1. This case highlights the importance of strict director disclosure obligations, especially where conflicts of interest arise. Plaintiff Funding matters often rely on transparency, and Hakea Holdings v McGrath reinforces accountability when directors manage overlapping roles and commercial relationships.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment